Work in progress. This site is being built in the open. No page on it has yet been reviewed by a clinician, every page says so, and nothing here is medical advice or a substitute for seeing someone about your knee. What that means
KneeSchool

KneeSchool/Clinical Examination Academy/Arthroplasty Assessment

Arthroplasty Assessment

Page 4.18.7 · Osteoarthritis Examination · examination page

The examination done when a replacement is being considered, which records what the operation has to correct and what it cannot.

Pipeline status. Editorial draft. Evidence verification did not run. Not consultant reviewed. Not for clinical use.

The same topic at 4 depths

Each tier deepens the one below it and never repeats it. Choose the level you want.

Arthroplasty Assessment

Choose a depth

For Medical Students

What It Tests

The assessment before a knee replacement records the deformity, the range, the stability, the function, the skin and the neurovascular state, and it checks that the knee is the source of the symptoms. 4.18.2 covers established disease.

It is a complete examination rather than a set of tests, and its purpose is a record rather than a diagnosis.

It also tests whether anything other than the knee is limiting the patient, because a replacement does not fix a hip or a spine. 4.2.15 covers referred pain.

How It Is Performed

Confirm the source: the pain is at the knee, reproduced by loading the knee, and not reproduced by moving the hip or the spine. 4.2.15 covers referred pain.

Record the function in activities, with the walking distance, the stairs, the chair and the sleep. 4.18.6 covers functional limitation.

Record the alignment standing in both planes, naming varus, valgus and fixed flexion separately. 4.3.3 covers standing alignment.

Record the range, with the extension deficit stated first. 4.5.4 covers the flexion deformity.

Record the correctability of the deformity and the state of both collateral ligaments. 4.3.10 covers the deformity.

Examine the skin for previous incisions, ulceration, cellulitis and venous change, since all affect the approach and the risk. 4.3.6 covers skin changes.

Record the neurovascular state, including the pulses and the sensation, as a baseline. 4.6.10 covers the popliteal fossa.

Examine the other knee and the hips, because the sequence of treatment depends on them. 4.1.4 covers the structured approach.

What a Positive Means

A knee with a deformity, a reduced range, an intact neurovascular state and function limited by the knee alone is the straightforward assessment.

A fixed flexion deficit tells the operation there is posterior work to do, and it is the deficit patients most often retain afterwards. 4.5.4 covers it.

Collateral laxity on the convex side records that the balance will have to be addressed as well as the alignment. 4.12.5 covers the posterior oblique ligament.

Previous incisions and poor skin change the approach and the risk, which is why the skin is examined before the joint. 4.3.6 covers skin changes.

Function limited by the hip or the spine as well as the knee predicts a partial benefit, and saying so before the operation is part of the assessment. 4.22.8 covers the use of these scores.

Key Learning Points

  • The assessment is a record of what the operation has to correct.
  • Confirming the knee is the source comes before recording its state.
  • Fixed flexion is the deficit patients most often retain afterwards.
  • Convex side laxity records that balance is needed as well as alignment.
  • The skin is examined before the joint, because it changes the approach.

MRCS Level

How It Is Performed

In a viva this is the preoperative assessment station and the expected answer is ordered and complete rather than clever.

The expected points are the source confirmation, the function, the alignment in both planes, the range with the deficit first, the correctability, the collaterals, the skin, the neurovascular state, the other joints and the expectation.

Say that you would examine the hip and the spine before accepting the knee as the source. 4.2.15 covers referred pain.

Say that you would record the expectation alongside the limitation, since the mismatch predicts dissatisfaction. 4.22.8 covers the use of these scores.

Say that you would record the neurovascular findings as a baseline rather than as a diagnostic step. 4.3.9 covers it.

What a Positive Means

The reasoning expected is that the operation corrects alignment, restores a range and balances the soft tissues, so the examination records the starting point for each of those three. 4.5.1 covers the mechanical axis.

A deformity that is correctable needs less release than one that is fixed, so correctability is a soft tissue statement rather than a bony one. 4.3.10 covers it.

A preoperative extension deficit predicts a postoperative one, which is why it is recorded separately and discussed. 4.5.4 covers the flexion deformity.

Laxity on the convex side means the balance has to be achieved against a longer ligament, which is a different problem from the alignment. 4.12.5 covers the posterior oblique ligament.

How Good It Is

The assessment is reliable for the deformity, the range and the function, because all three are directly measured.

Its contribution is the complete preoperative record, which the operation plan and the consent conversation both use. 4.18.6 covers functional limitation.

It is poor at predicting the intraoperative soft tissue behaviour, which is a known limitation rather than a deficiency of technique. 4.3.10 covers the deformity.

Long leg films provide the geometry and the templating, so the examination supplies the clinical state and the films supply the plan. 4.1.6 covers that relationship.

No figures appear for any accuracy comparison on this page, under decision 023, and the comparison is the claim being made.

Key Learning Points

  • The operation corrects alignment, restores range and balances soft tissues.
  • Correctability is a soft tissue statement rather than a bony one.
  • A preoperative extension deficit predicts a postoperative one.
  • Convex side laxity means balancing against a longer ligament.
  • The examination cannot predict intraoperative soft tissue behaviour.

FRCS Level

How Good It Is

At decision level the assessment decides whether to replace, what to replace and in what order, and the examination contributes to all three.

Isolated compartment disease with a correctable deformity, intact ligaments and a good range is the group where a partial replacement is weighed, and the examination defines it. 4.20.7 covers that assessment.

Multiple compartment involvement, a fixed deformity or ligament deficiency moves the knee to a total replacement, and the examination is again the discriminator. 4.20.8 covers it.

Bilateral disease and coexisting hip disease set the sequence, so the other joints are examined as part of the decision rather than afterwards. 4.1.4 covers the structured approach.

Function limited by factors outside the knee is identified before the operation rather than discovered after it. 4.2.15 covers referred pain.

Where It Misleads

The commonest error is omitting the hip, since hip disease produces knee pain and a worn knee examines abnormally regardless. 4.2.15 covers referred pain.

Correctability assessed with force overstates what the operation will achieve without release. 4.3.10 covers the deformity.

Collateral laxity assessed in a stiff or deformed knee is unreliable, because the position changes the restraint being tested. 4.12.3 covers the assessment in flexion.

Function recorded without expectation produces a technically good result and a dissatisfied patient. 4.22.8 covers the use of these scores.

A normal neurovascular examination not recorded is the same as not having been done, once a postoperative question arises. 4.3.9 covers it.

Key Learning Points

  • Omitting the hip is the commonest error in this assessment.
  • Correctability under force overstates what is achievable without release.
  • Laxity in a stiff or deformed knee is unreliable.
  • Function without expectation produces dissatisfaction.
  • An unrecorded normal neurovascular examination counts as not done.

Fellowship Level

Where It Misleads

At fellowship level the assessment is the basis of a plan, and its weaknesses are the plan's weaknesses.

The clinical deformity and the radiographic deformity answer different questions, and substituting one for the other loses either the soft tissue state or the geometry. 4.5.1 covers the mechanical axis.

Correctability is a continuum assessed by hand, so two examiners record different answers on the same knee and the operative plan inherits the difference. 4.3.10 covers the deformity.

A patient whose function is limited by several joints is served by a sequence rather than a single operation, and the examination has to establish the order rather than only the list. 4.1.4 covers the structured approach.

The examination cannot assess bone quality, bone loss or the extensor mechanism's competence under load, and each of those changes the implant decision. 4.3.9 covers muscle wasting.

Expectation is the finding most often recorded loosely and the one most predictive of the reported outcome, which is a mismatch worth naming. 4.22.8 covers the use of these scores.

Key Learning Points

  • Clinical and radiographic deformity answer different questions.
  • Correctability is a continuum and two examiners will record it differently.
  • A multi joint patient needs a sequence, so the examination establishes the order.
  • Bone quality and bone loss are not assessable clinically.
  • Expectation is recorded loosely and predicts the reported outcome.

Explore Further

Where this topic came from and where it goes next in the spiral.

References

No reference list is attached to this draft. Evidence verification has not run, because source retrieval was unavailable at generation time. Under the Operations Handbook a missing reference is acceptable and an invented one is a critical failure, so nothing has been cited and no citation marker appears in the text. This page carries no diagnostic accuracy figure, which is decision 023 rather than an omission. The comparative standing of these tests is standard teaching and a specific sensitivity written from memory is the same class of claim as an invented citation, so ACC-001 refuses the number and the page states the comparison. A reviewer with the literature can add the figures into How Good It Is without restructuring the page, and chapter 3.17 lists the studies the figures would come from. Any measurement here, including a flexion angle, is written from standard teaching, has not been checked, and is registered under decision 006 in pipeline/config/figures with a verification state of UNVERIFIED_FROM_MEMORY.

Safety. KneeSchool is educational and does not give individual medical advice. Seek urgent assessment for a knee that cannot bear weight after an injury, a hot swollen knee with a fever, or new numbness, weakness or coldness in the leg or foot.