KneeSchool/Clinical Examination Academy/Cartilage Surgery
Cartilage Surgery
Page 4.20.5 · Examination of the Post-operative Knee · examination page
Examining a knee after a cartilage lesion has been treated, where the result takes longer to declare itself than any other knee operation.
The same topic at 4 depths
Each tier deepens the one below it and never repeats it. Choose the level you want.
Cartilage Surgery
Choose a depthFor Medical Students
What It Tests
After cartilage surgery the examination is checking the effusion, the range, the loading pain and the alignment, because those are what the result shows itself through. 4.17.5 covers articular cartilage defects.
The examination is read against a long timeline, since the repair tissue matures over many months. 4.2.34 covers previous rehabilitation.
It matters that the lesion's cause is usually still present, so the alignment and the meniscal state are examined as part of the follow up. 4.3.3 covers standing alignment.
How It Is Performed
Establish what was done, where, how large the lesion was and when. 4.2.30 covers previous surgery.
Look at the scars and ask about any concurrent osteotomy or meniscal procedure. 4.3.7 covers surgical scars.
Assess the effusion, since a recurrent activity related effusion is the common finding when the result is not holding. 4.8.3 covers the bulge sign.
Measure the range, recording any restriction, because stiffness after cartilage surgery is common. 4.7.10 covers the post operative range assessment.
Assess the painful arc, since a treated lesion is loaded at a particular flexion angle. 4.7.6 covers the painful arc.
Palpate the compartment joint line and the patellofemoral joint, depending on the lesion's site. 4.6.4 covers joint line tenderness.
Assess the alignment, because the load that produced the lesion has not changed unless it was corrected. 4.5.1 covers the mechanical axis.
Assess function, because the patient's judgement of the result is functional rather than structural. 4.7.9 covers the functional range.
What a Positive Means
A settled knee with a full range, no effusion and reduced loading pain is the expected result, and it takes many months.
A recurrent activity related effusion with pain at the same arc suggests the treated area is not tolerating load. 4.7.6 covers the painful arc.
Stiffness without an effusion is a rehabilitation problem rather than a failure of the graft or the repair tissue. 4.7.5 covers the end feel.
Compartment pain with a malaligned limb suggests the load was never addressed. 4.18.3 covers the varus worn knee.
A mechanical symptom after cartilage surgery raises a loose fragment or a delaminated graft. 4.17.2 covers mechanical symptoms.
Key Learning Points
- The result takes many months to declare itself.
- A recurrent activity related effusion is the common sign of a result not holding.
- Stiffness without an effusion is a rehabilitation problem.
- The lesion's cause persists unless the alignment was corrected.
- A mechanical symptom raises a loose fragment or a delaminated graft.
MRCS Level
How It Is Performed
In a viva this is the post cartilage surgery station and the expected answer knows the timeline and examines the cause.
The expected points are the procedure and its date, the lesion's site and size, the scars, any concurrent procedure, the effusion, the range, the painful arc, the compartment, the alignment and the function.
Say that you would read the examination against a long timeline, since the repair tissue matures slowly. 4.2.9 covers the onset.
Say that you would examine the alignment, because the load that caused the lesion persists. 4.5.1 covers the mechanical axis.
Say that you would record function, since that is what the patient judges the result by. 4.7.9 covers the functional range.
What a Positive Means
The reasoning expected is that repair tissue is mechanically inferior to the cartilage it replaces, so it tolerates less load and takes longer to mature. 3.5.1 covers contact areas.
The load on a treated area depends on the flexion angle, which is why the painful arc localises the lesion and follows it. 3.5.4 covers the effects of flexion.
A malaligned limb concentrates load on the treated compartment, which is why correction accompanies treatment of a lesion in a malaligned knee. 3.5.6 covers the effects of malalignment.
A meniscus deficient compartment loads a treated lesion more, which is why the meniscal state is part of the assessment. 3.6.5 covers load sharing.
How Good It Is
The examination follows the knee's symptomatic recovery reliably and says nothing about the repair tissue.
Its best contribution is the effusion and the painful arc together, which track whether the treated area is tolerating load. 4.7.6 covers the painful arc.
It cannot assess graft integration, fill or delamination.
Magnetic resonance imaging assesses the repair tissue, so the examination establishes the tolerance and the imaging the structure. 4.1.6 covers that relationship.
No figures appear for any accuracy comparison on this page, under decision 023, and the comparison is the claim being made.
Key Learning Points
- Repair tissue tolerates less load than the cartilage it replaces.
- The load depends on the flexion angle, which is why the arc follows the lesion.
- A malaligned limb concentrates load on the treated compartment.
- A meniscus deficient compartment loads a treated lesion more.
- The examination tracks tolerance and not structure.
FRCS Level
How Good It Is
At decision level the examination separates a maturing result, a failing one, stiffness and an unaddressed cause.
A recurrent effusion with pain at the lesion's arc after the expected maturation period suggests the treatment has not held. 4.8.3 covers the bulge sign.
Stiffness with a quiet joint is a rehabilitation problem, and the end feel distinguishes a contracture from a block. 4.7.5 covers the end feel.
Compartment pain with an uncorrected malalignment is a load problem, and that is a different operation. 4.20.4 covers the osteotomy assessment.
A mechanical symptom raises a delaminated graft or a loose body, which is urgent. 4.17.2 covers mechanical symptoms.
Where It Misleads
The commonest error is judging the result too early, since the repair tissue has not matured. 4.2.9 covers the onset.
An effusion is read as failure when it follows an increase in activity during rehabilitation. 4.8.3 covers the bulge sign.
Pain at a different arc from the lesion is attributed to the treated area. 4.7.6 covers the painful arc.
The alignment is omitted, so a load problem is called a treatment failure. 4.5.1 covers the mechanical axis.
A concurrent meniscal or ligament procedure is not accounted for, and all the findings are assigned to the cartilage. 4.20.2 covers the meniscal repair assessment.
Key Learning Points
- Judging the result too early is the commonest error.
- An effusion after an activity increase is not automatically failure.
- Pain at a different arc is not the treated area.
- Omitting the alignment turns a load problem into a treatment failure.
- A concurrent procedure makes attribution unreliable.
Fellowship Level
Where It Misleads
At fellowship level the examination's limitation is that the question is structural and the findings are symptomatic.
Repair tissue quality determines the durability and is invisible to the examination, so the clinical result and the structural one can diverge for years. 4.17.5 covers articular cartilage defects.
The lesion's size and containment determine the expected result, and the examination does not measure either. 4.17.3 covers osteochondral lesions.
Symptoms from the treated lesion, the surrounding cartilage and the subchondral bone are not separable clinically, and each has a different implication. 4.17.1 covers the cartilage presentation.
A concurrent osteotomy changes every alignment finding and much of the symptom pattern, so the cartilage result is harder to isolate afterwards. 4.20.4 covers that assessment.
Function and structure diverge in both directions here, so a satisfied patient with a failing repair and a dissatisfied one with a good repair both occur. 4.7.9 covers the functional range.
Key Learning Points
- Repair tissue quality is invisible to the examination.
- Lesion size and containment govern the result and are not clinically measurable.
- Lesion, surrounding cartilage and subchondral pain are not separable clinically.
- A concurrent osteotomy makes the cartilage result harder to isolate.
- Function and structure diverge in both directions.
Explore Further
Where this topic came from and where it goes next in the spiral.
- 4.17.5Articular Cartilage Defects
- 4.17.3Osteochondral Lesions
- 4.20.4Osteotomy
- 4.7.6Painful Arc
- 4.5.1Mechanical Axis Assessment
- 4.17.2Mechanical Symptoms
References
No reference list is attached to this draft. Evidence verification has not run, because source retrieval was unavailable at generation time. Under the Operations Handbook a missing reference is acceptable and an invented one is a critical failure, so nothing has been cited and no citation marker appears in the text. This page carries no diagnostic accuracy figure, which is decision 023 rather than an omission. The comparative standing of these tests is standard teaching and a specific sensitivity written from memory is the same class of claim as an invented citation, so ACC-001 refuses the number and the page states the comparison. A reviewer with the literature can add the figures into How Good It Is without restructuring the page, and chapter 3.17 lists the studies the figures would come from. Any measurement here, including a flexion angle, is written from standard teaching, has not been checked, and is registered under decision 006 in pipeline/config/figures with a verification state of UNVERIFIED_FROM_MEMORY.
Safety. KneeSchool is educational and does not give individual medical advice. Seek urgent assessment for a knee that cannot bear weight after an injury, a hot swollen knee with a fever, or new numbness, weakness or coldness in the leg or foot.