KneeSchool/Imaging Academy/Chondral Defects
Chondral Defects
Page 5.11.2 · Cartilage MRI · imaging page
A loss of cartilage down to or through its depth, which is the finding a repair decision rests on.
The same topic at 4 depths
Each tier deepens the one below it and never repeats it. Choose the level you want.
Chondral Defects
Choose a depthFor Medical Students
What It Shows
A chondral defect is an area where cartilage is thinned or absent, with the subchondral plate intact beneath it. 5.11.5 covers osteochondral lesions.
It is described by its depth, its area and its location, and by the state of the cartilage around it. 5.11.1 covers normal cartilage.
It matters because a focal defect with healthy surrounding cartilage is a repairable lesion, and diffuse thinning is not. 5.11.8 covers cartilage repair procedures.
How It Is Acquired
Use a cartilage sensitive sequence, since a routine protocol understates the loss. 5.2.18 covers gradient echo imaging.
Assess the depth against the full thickness of the adjacent cartilage. 5.11.1 covers normal cartilage.
Assess the area in two planes, because a defect's extent is easily underestimated from one. 5.5.1 covers the standard protocol.
Assess the surrounding cartilage, which decides whether the lesion is focal. 5.11.3 covers fissuring.
Assess the subchondral plate and marrow, which distinguishes a chondral from an osteochondral lesion. 5.11.7 covers bone marrow lesions.
What Abnormal Looks Like
A focal area of reduced cartilage thickness with fluid signal filling the deficiency. 5.11.1 covers normal cartilage.
A full thickness defect exposing the subchondral plate. 5.5.6 covers the bones.
Shouldered margins where the surrounding cartilage is of normal thickness, which is the repairable pattern. 5.11.8 covers cartilage repair procedures.
Subchondral marrow signal beneath the defect. 5.11.7 covers bone marrow lesions.
Key Learning Points
- A chondral defect spares the subchondral plate.
- It is described by depth, area, location and the surrounding cartilage.
- A focal defect with healthy margins is repairable.
- Diffuse thinning is a different problem.
- Marrow signal beneath the defect is expected.
MRCS Level
How It Is Acquired
In a viva this is the lesion to describe in four variables rather than to name.
The expected points are the cartilage sequence, the depth, the area in two planes, the surrounding cartilage, and the subchondral plate.
Say that shouldered margins distinguish a repairable lesion. 5.11.8 covers cartilage repair procedures.
Say that the subchondral plate's state separates a chondral from an osteochondral lesion. 5.11.5 covers osteochondral lesions.
Say that a routine protocol understates the depth and the area. 5.5.1 covers the standard protocol.
What Abnormal Looks Like
The reasoning expected is that a repair procedure fills a defect, so it needs walls to fill against, and that is why the surrounding cartilage's thickness determines whether the lesion is treatable rather than its own size. 5.11.8 covers cartilage repair procedures.
A defect in a compartment of diffuse thinning has no walls, which makes it part of a degenerate compartment rather than a focal lesion. 5.3.17 covers joint space narrowing.
Depth matters because a full thickness defect exposes bone and loses the whole load bearing layer, while a partial one retains some. 3.5.2 covers the contact pressures.
Area matters because contact pressure rises around the rim, so a larger defect loads its own margins harder and tends to enlarge. 3.5.1 covers the contact areas.
How Good It Is
Magnetic resonance imaging detects a focal full thickness defect reliably and grades partial thickness loss poorly.
Its best contribution is the full thickness focal lesion with healthy margins, which is the surgical lesion. 5.11.8 covers cartilage repair procedures.
It is limited for depth grading and for area, both of which are routinely underestimated against arthroscopy. 5.21.3 covers the cartilage imaging literature.
No figures appear for accuracy on this page, under decision 028, and no defect size or depth thresholds appear either: the operative thresholds are published quantities and this environment cannot check them.
Key Learning Points
- A repair fills a defect, so it needs walls to fill against.
- A defect in a thinned compartment has no walls.
- A full thickness defect loses the whole load bearing layer.
- Contact pressure rises at the rim, so a defect loads its own margins.
- Depth and area are routinely underestimated against arthroscopy.
FRCS Level
How Good It Is
At decision level this page supplies the four variables a cartilage repair decision is made on.
A focal full thickness defect with healthy margins in a young patient with a normally aligned limb is the repair picture, and the imaging supplies three of those four. 5.11.8 covers cartilage repair procedures.
Diffuse thinning across the compartment is a compartment problem, and a repair has nothing to repair into. 5.3.17 covers joint space narrowing.
Malalignment loading the defect has to be addressed or the repair is loaded to failure, which makes the alignment film part of the cartilage assessment. 5.3.7 covers the mechanical axis.
A meniscal deficiency in the same compartment has the same consequence. 5.6.11 covers meniscal extrusion.
Where It Misleads
The commonest error is assessing a defect on a routine protocol and underestimating it. 5.5.1 covers the standard protocol.
The surrounding cartilage is not described, so the lesion's focality is unknown. 5.11.3 covers fissuring.
Area is measured in one plane. 5.5.1 covers the standard protocol.
Alignment and meniscal state are left out of the assessment. 5.3.7 covers the mechanical axis.
A defect is reported without the subchondral plate being assessed. 5.11.5 covers osteochondral lesions.
Key Learning Points
- A defect assessed on a routine protocol is underestimated.
- Without the surrounding cartilage the lesion's focality is unknown.
- Area measured in one plane is underestimated.
- Alignment and meniscal state belong in the assessment.
- The subchondral plate must be assessed.
Fellowship Level
Where It Misleads
At fellowship level the chondral defect is the lesion whose imaging assessment disagrees with arthroscopy most consistently in one direction.
Magnetic resonance imaging underestimates both depth and area against direct inspection, so a lesion judged suitable on imaging can be found otherwise, which makes the imaging a screening step rather than a planning one. 5.21.3 covers the cartilage imaging literature.
The grading systems in use were derived on particular sequences and are applied across protocols, so a grade without its protocol is not comparable with a threshold. 5.20.5 covers reporting cartilage lesions.
The variables that determine a repair's outcome include alignment, meniscal status and the matrix state of the surrounding cartilage, and only the first two are routinely assessed. 5.18.2 covers T2 mapping.
Quantitative area measurement from three dimensional acquisitions is more reproducible than a reported estimate and is not routine, so the number a surgeon plans with is usually an impression. 5.2.18 covers gradient echo imaging.
The defensible position is to report the four variables explicitly and to say that the depth and area are minimum estimates. 5.20.5 covers reporting cartilage lesions.
Key Learning Points
- Imaging underestimates depth and area against inspection, consistently.
- The imaging is a screening step rather than a planning one.
- A grade without its protocol is not comparable with a threshold.
- The matrix state of the surrounding cartilage is not routinely assessed.
- Report the four variables and call depth and area minimum estimates.
Explore Further
Where this topic came from and where it goes next in the spiral.
- 5.11.1Normal Cartilage
- 5.11.3Fissuring
- 5.11.5Osteochondral Lesions
- 5.11.8Cartilage Repair Procedures
- 5.3.7Mechanical Axis
- 5.20.5Reporting Cartilage Lesions
References
No reference list is attached to this draft. Evidence verification has not run, because source retrieval was unavailable at generation time. Under the Operations Handbook a missing reference is acceptable and an invented one is a critical failure, so nothing has been cited and no citation marker appears in the text. This page carries no diagnostic accuracy figure, which is decision 028 rather than an omission: the comparative standing of the modalities is standard teaching and a specific sensitivity written from memory is the same class of claim as an invented citation, so ACC-001 refuses the number and the page states the comparison. A reviewer with the literature can add the figures into How Good It Is without restructuring the page. Any measurement here, including a sequence parameter, an angle or a millimetre, is written from standard teaching, has not been checked, and is registered under decision 006 in pipeline/config/figures with a verification state of UNVERIFIED_FROM_MEMORY.
Safety. KneeSchool is educational and does not give individual medical advice. Seek urgent assessment for a knee that cannot bear weight after an injury, a hot swollen knee with a fever, or new numbness, weakness or coldness in the leg or foot.