KneeSchool/Imaging Academy/TT-TG Measurement
TT-TG Measurement
Page 5.16.4 · CT of the Knee · imaging page
A distance between two landmarks that depends on the modality, the flexion angle and the reference line, so a value alone is not a measurement.
The same topic at 4 depths
Each tier deepens the one below it and never repeats it. Choose the level you want.
TT-TG Measurement
Choose a depthFor Medical Students
What It Shows
The measurement is the distance between the tibial tubercle and the trochlear groove, taken along a line across the joint. 2.2.5 covers the tibial tubercle.
It is made from axial images, by superimposing a slice through the groove on a slice through the tubercle. 2.1.5 covers the trochlea.
It matters because it is the number used to decide whether the tubercle is transferred, which makes it the most consequential measurement in patellofemoral practice. 5.12.4 covers patellar subluxation.
How It Is Acquired
Identify the deepest point of the trochlear groove on an axial slice. 5.12.1 covers trochlear dysplasia.
Identify the centre of the patellar tendon insertion on the tubercle. 2.2.5 covers the tibial tubercle.
Draw the reference line across the posterior femoral condyles and measure both points against it. 2.1.2 covers the distal femur.
State the knee position, because the measurement changes with flexion. 3.12.1 covers patellar tracking.
State the modality, since computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging give systematically different values. 5.5.1 covers the standard protocol.
What Normal Looks Like
Both landmarks identifiable on their own slices. 2.1.5 covers the trochlea.
A reference line drawn on a slice where both posterior condyles are visible. 2.1.2 covers the distal femur.
The knee near extension with the quadriceps relaxed, and the position recorded. 3.12.1 covers patellar tracking.
A value reported with the modality, the position and the reference line that produced it. 5.20.1 covers structured reporting.
What Abnormal Looks Like
A tubercle positioned laterally relative to the groove. 2.2.5 covers the tibial tubercle.
A groove too shallow for a deepest point to be found, which makes the measurement unreliable rather than high. 5.12.1 covers trochlear dysplasia.
A value quoted with no modality, no position and no reference line. 5.20.8 covers common reporting errors.
A value compared with a threshold derived by a different method. 5.21.4 covers the patellofemoral imaging literature.
Key Learning Points
- The measurement is a distance between two landmarks.
- A reference line across the posterior condyles is needed.
- The value changes with flexion.
- The two modalities give systematically different values.
- A dysplastic groove makes the measurement unreliable.
MRCS Level
How It Is Acquired
In a viva the expected answer gives the method before the number.
The expected points are the two landmarks, the reference line, the knee position, the modality, and the dysplastic groove.
Say that the measurement is made on superimposed slices rather than on one. 5.2.22 covers the CT acquisition.
Say that a value without its method is not a measurement. 5.20.1 covers structured reporting.
Say that it is one factor among several rather than a decision by itself. 5.12.1 covers trochlear dysplasia.
What Abnormal Looks Like
The reasoning expected is that the measurement stands in for the lateral force on the patella, which is why it predicts instability and why it is sensitive to everything that alters that geometry. 3.12.6 covers the Q angle.
Flexion engages the patella and rotates the tibia, so the same knee measures differently at different angles. 3.3.5 covers the screw home mechanism.
Computed tomography is acquired with the limb positioned by the table and magnetic resonance imaging with it positioned by the coil, which is part of why the two differ. 5.5.1 covers the standard protocol.
A dysplastic trochlea has no identifiable deepest point, so the measurement inherits that uncertainty rather than reporting it. 5.12.1 covers trochlear dysplasia.
How Good It Is
The measurement is reproducible within one method and is not comparable between methods.
Its best contribution is identifying the patient in whom a tubercle transfer enters the discussion. 5.16.5 covers osteotomy planning.
It is limited by modality dependence, by flexion dependence, by the choice of reference line, and by thresholds derived in cohorts measured differently. 5.21.4 covers the patellofemoral imaging literature.
No figures appear for accuracy on this page, under decision 028, and no distance values or surgical thresholds appear either: those are published quantities tied to particular methods and this environment cannot check them. Pages across Section 5 cite this one as the place that statement is made.
Key Learning Points
- The measurement stands in for a lateral force.
- Flexion changes the value in the same knee.
- The two modalities differ partly through positioning.
- A dysplastic groove makes the landmark uncertain.
- A threshold belongs to the cohort and method behind it.
FRCS Level
How Good It Is
At decision level the value contributes to a decision about the tubercle and does not make it. 5.16.5 covers osteotomy planning.
The groove, the patellar height and the rotation are read from the same study, because they interact. 5.12.2 covers patella alta.
A value near a threshold is a reason to weigh the other factors rather than to operate. 5.12.1 covers trochlear dysplasia.
A rotational profile can explain a value that the local anatomy does not. 5.16.3 covers the rotational profiles.
The examination and the history carry the instability itself, which no measurement records. 4.15.3 covers the patellar apprehension test.
Where It Misleads
The commonest error is quoting a value with no method attached. 5.20.8 covers common reporting errors.
A threshold from a computed tomography cohort is applied to a magnetic resonance value. 5.21.4 covers the patellofemoral imaging literature.
A measurement from a flexed knee is compared with one taken near extension. 3.12.1 covers patellar tracking.
A dysplastic groove yields a confident value from an uncertain landmark. 5.12.1 covers trochlear dysplasia.
The value is treated as the indication rather than as one input, which is the error with the largest operative consequence. 5.12.4 covers patellar subluxation.
Key Learning Points
- A value with no method is not usable.
- A threshold does not transfer between modalities.
- Flexion has to match between measurements being compared.
- An uncertain landmark still yields a confident number.
- The value is an input rather than an indication.
Fellowship Level
Where It Misleads
At fellowship level the value arrives in a letter, with no modality, no position and no reference line, and a plan already built on it. 5.20.1 covers structured reporting.
Remeasuring is the only way to know what it means, and that needs the images. 5.20.8 covers common reporting errors.
Alternative measurements of the same geometry exist and give different answers, so a second opinion that remeasures differently will disagree legitimately. 5.21.4 covers the patellofemoral imaging literature.
After a tubercle transfer the measurement describes the operation, so it cannot be used to judge the operation's result. 5.12.8 covers the post-operative imaging.
Automated measurement fixes the landmark rules and so fixes one convention, which removes variability without settling which convention is right. 5.18.8 covers artificial intelligence in imaging.
The useful report gives the modality, the knee position, the reference line, both landmark slices, and the value last. 5.20.1 covers structured reporting.
Key Learning Points
- A value in a letter usually arrives with no method.
- Remeasuring needs the images.
- Alternative measurements disagree legitimately.
- After a transfer the measurement describes the operation.
- The method belongs before the value in the report.
Explore Further
Where this topic came from and where it goes next in the spiral.
- 5.12.1Trochlear Dysplasia
- 5.12.4Patellar Subluxation
- 5.16.3Rotational Profiles
- 5.16.5Osteotomy Planning
- 2.2.5Tibial Tubercle
- 5.21.4Patellofemoral Imaging Literature
References
No reference list is attached to this draft. Evidence verification has not run, because source retrieval was unavailable at generation time. Under the Operations Handbook a missing reference is acceptable and an invented one is a critical failure, so nothing has been cited and no citation marker appears in the text. This page carries no diagnostic accuracy figure, which is decision 028 rather than an omission: the comparative standing of the modalities is standard teaching and a specific sensitivity written from memory is the same class of claim as an invented citation, so ACC-001 refuses the number and the page states the comparison. A reviewer with the literature can add the figures into How Good It Is without restructuring the page. Any measurement here, including a sequence parameter, an angle or a millimetre, is written from standard teaching, has not been checked, and is registered under decision 006 in pipeline/config/figures with a verification state of UNVERIFIED_FROM_MEMORY.
Safety. KneeSchool is educational and does not give individual medical advice. Seek urgent assessment for a knee that cannot bear weight after an injury, a hot swollen knee with a fever, or new numbness, weakness or coldness in the leg or foot.